Schedule Of Courses LAW 427, COMM ECON DEV LAW CLINIC. LAW 435, CL death penalty CLINIC. LAW 448,intl LEGAL CLINIC. LAW 542, FINANCIAL SERVICES. LAW 543, FED PRAC civ rights/LIB. http://www.siss.duke.edu/Schedule/0920/LAW/
Extractions: Find classes with available space in LAW Classes available in subject LAW (Law) Classes Description LAW 110 CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW 120 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LAW 130 CONTRACTS LAW 140 CRIMINAL LAW LAW 160A LEGAL ANLY/RESEARCH/WRIT LAW 180 TORTS LAW 190 DISTINCT ASPECTS U S LAW LAW 195 LEGL ANLY/RES/WR INT STU LAW 210 BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS LAW 220 CONFLICT OF LAWS LAW 225 CRIM PROCEDURE: FORMAL LAW 227 USE OF FORCE IN INTERNTL LAW LAW 235 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW LAW 236 INT'L HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 245 EVIDENCE LAW 255 FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION LAW 260 FINANCIAL INFORMATION LAW 264 SPECIAL TOPICS-LECTURES LAW 265 FIRST AMENDMENT LAW 267 INSURANCE LAW LAW 270 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 275 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW LAW 278 LEGAL RESPNSE TO WAR CRIMES LAW 283 LAW 285 LABOR RELATIONS LAW LAW 287 COMMERCIAL/BANKRUPT LAW LAW 295 TRUSTS AND ESTATES LAW 301 AIDS LAW LAW 303 AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY LAW 304 AM LEGAL PROF HIST PERSP LAW 305 BANKING REGULA/FEDERAL LAW 310 COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LAW 314 COMM ECON DEVELOPMENT LAW LAW 316 WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS LAW 325 CORPORATE FINANCE LAW 329 EDUCATION LAW LAW 335 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW LAW 338 ANIMAL LAW LAW 340 ESTATE AND GIFT TAXATION LAW 341 FOOD AND DRUG LAW LAW 347 HEALTH CARE LAW/POLICY LAW 351 CURRENT IMMIGRA LAW/PRAC LAW 361 INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW LAW 371 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LAW 378 REAL ESTATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP LAW 388 LAW 393 TRADEMARK LAW/UNFAIR COM LAW 400 CL AIDS LEGAL ASSIST PRO LAW 405 CL APPELLATE PRACTICE LAW 416 LAW 420 CL CIV/CRIM TRIAL PRACT LAW 427 COMM ECON DEV LAW CLINIC
University Of Michigan Law School Course List 618 death penalty Habeas Corpus Human rights. 818 Faking It. 891 Fed Inc Tax Rel to Real Estate. 898 Fed Prac in civ Internet Issues in intl Prop. 890 IP http://cgi2.www.law.umich.edu/_ClassSchedule/CourseList.asp
Extractions: Most of the work for the first year is required. There are several reasons for this. One reason is that there are some basic principles which any serious and thoughtful student would choose to study early in his or her career. The study of this fairly traditional material has become one of the experiences shared by almost all lawyers. Also, knowledge of all the materials to which the student is exposed makes it somewhat easier for first-year instructors to plan a program which minimizes overlapping presentations. By restricting elections in the first year, the School is able to keep the first-year students together in groups of about 90. The logistics of scheduling 90-person groups is much more manageable under restricted elections than it would be in an environment in which elections varied widely.
Course Listing For JURI issues such as procedural problems in death penalty cases, criminal schools; parent,student, and teacher rights and responsibilities Oasis Title intl civ LITIG http://www.bulletin.uga.edu/bulletin/courses/descript/juri.html
Schedule Of Courses LAW 427 COMM ECON DEV LAW CLINIC. 9614, 01, TBA, 4 / 4, 0 / 0, 0. LAW 435 - CLDEATH penalty CLINIC. LAW 448 - intl LEGAL CLINIC. LAW 543 - FED PRAC civ rights/LIB. http://www.siss.duke.edu/Schedule/0920/LAW/capacities.html
Extractions: Waitlisted LAW 110 - CIVIL PROCEDURE M Tu W Th F 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM M Tu W Th F 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM M Tu W Th F 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM LAW 120 - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW M Tu W Th F 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM M Tu W Th F 08:40 AM - 09:40 AM LAW 130 - CONTRACTS M Tu W Th F 08:40 AM - 09:40 AM M Tu W Th F 08:40 AM - 09:40 AM LAW 140 - CRIMINAL LAW M Tu W Th F 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM LAW 160A - LEGAL ANLY/RESEARCH/WRIT M Th 09:50 AM - 10:50 AM M Th 09:50 AM - 10:50 AM Tu F 09:50 AM - 10:50 AM Tu F 09:50 AM - 10:50 AM Tu F 09:50 AM - 10:50 AM LAW 180 - TORTS M Tu W Th F 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM M Tu W Th F 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM LAW 190 - DISTINCT ASPECTS U S LAW M 05:00 PM - 06:15 PM LAW 195 - LEGL ANLY/RES/WR INT STU M W 09:50 AM - 10:50 AM M W 02:40 PM - 03:40 PM Tu Th 08:40 AM - 09:40 AM LAW 210 - BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS M Tu W Th 11:00 AM - 11:55 AM LAW 220 - CONFLICT OF LAWS M W 11:00 AM - 12:35 PM LAW 225 - CRIM PROCEDURE: FORMAL Tu Th 08:15 AM - 09:40 AM LAW 227 - USE OF FORCE IN INTERNTL LAW M W F 08:40 AM - 09:35 AM LAW 235 - ENVIRONMENTAL LAW M 11:00 AM - 12:50 PM Tu 11:00 AM - 11:55 AM LAW 236 - INT'L HUMAN RIGHTS TBA LAW 245 - EVIDENCE M Tu W Th 09:50 AM - 10:45 AM LAW 255 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION M Tu W Th F 09:50 AM - 10:45 AM M Tu W Th F 11:00 AM - 11:55 AM LAW 260 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Tu Th 08:15 AM - 09:40 AM LAW 264 - SPECIAL TOPICS-LECTURES M Th 01:15 PM - 03:30 PM
Course Descriptions: LAW: Law - CUA LAW466 Commercial Transactions LAW468 civ Rgts/Lgl Int'l Business TranactionsLAW560 death penalty Seminar LAW561 Toxic Wastes LAW751 intl Arbitr http://home.cua.edu/courselist/courses.cfm?DEPT=LAW
Untitled 960106133201. 33848C 100000@ jefferson. to declare the death penalty unconstitutional). A political Subject Re Civil rights Films? (fwd) Message-Id in association with Varied Directions intl. ; director, David http://lists.village.virginia.edu/listservs/sixties-l/jan.06.96
Extractions: From sixties Sat Jan 6 18:33:37 1996 Received: by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (5.67a8/1.34) id AA36837; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 13:33:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Jan 1996 13:33:37 -0500 (EST) From: sixties@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU To: sixties-l Subject: Alienation and protest (fwd) Message-Id: Subject: Re: Political Prisoners (fwd) Message-Id: Subject: Re: Freedom on My Mind (fwd) Message-Id: Subject: Re: Civil Rights Films? (fwd) Message-Id: Subject: Re: Civil Rights films (multiple responses) (fwd) Message-Id: To: sixties@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU Subject: Re: Civil Rights films (multiple responses) Sender: roscoe@halcyon.com (Stu Shiffman and Andi Shechter) Subject: Re: Civil Rights films (multiple responses) Renny mentioned "Thunderheart" about Pine Ridge - there's also the documentary "Incident at Oglala", which I'd recommend as a clear film on what happened in SD and seems to match the PEter Mattheisen tome about the entire event. I'd also agree with Sharon on the film "Long Walk Home". I liked that it wasn't very sentimentalized, but showed people acting as real people do - well-intended, at times, liberals who think they're being kind, and normal, everyday people pushed to the limit by circumstances. Andi Shechter
Senate Bills For 92nd General Assembly HOUSINGTECH SB1903 CRIM CD-death penalty-RETARDED SB1904 O PRO-FORCIBLE ENTRY-DEMANSB1935 civ PRO-PROCESS SOJU SB1945 EXPANSION O'HARE intl AIRPORT SB1946 CT http://www.legis.state.il.us/legislation/legisnet92/sbgroups/sbgroup20.html
Court Summaries April 8, 2002 Carll v.Terminix intl., 2002 Pa.Super. 44 pendent jurisdiction Fed.R.civ.P. 56(c) summary death penalty. EVIDENCE PRIOR MURDER CONVICTION mitigation evidence http://www.pa-bar.org/membersonly/courtsummaries/cs040802.shtml
Extractions: ALIMONY TERMINATION property settlement agreement companion of opposite sex shared household duties not family member no interdependence sexual financial social not living together as spouses NO COHABITATION petition to terminate alimony denied Snyder v. Snyder, 52 Northampton 286 (Nov. 22, 2001) No cohabitation for purposes of terminating alimony per property settlement agreement when respondent lives with and spends significant time with person of opposite sex, but does not have financial, social and sexual interdependence with that person or live as husband and wife. Third Circuit BIVENS ACTION Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. 2412(b) award of judgment Age Discrimination in Employment Act STATUTORY CAP hourly rate REASONABLE FEES jurisdiction plenary standard of review award of attorneys fees vacated matter remanded for recalculation of fees Newmark v. Principi, No. 01-1809 (March 13, 2002) Attorneys fees incurred successfully prosecuting Age Discrimination in Employment Act claims in Bivens action not limited to $125 per hour under Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(b). Court may award reasonable fees to prevailing party in such action.
Court Summaries By Timothy L Fed.R.civ.P. intl. v. Mason, No. 00504 (Oct. 5, 2000) Motion for temporary restraining order under Fed.R.civ.P. and Effective death penalty Act http://www.pa-bar.org/membersonly/courtsummaries/court111100.shtml
Extractions: Court Summaries by Timothy L. Clawges AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE Common Pleas LIMITED TORT OPTION COVERAGE LAPSE payment missed by insured Section 1705(a) MVFRL 75 Pa.C.S. §1705(a) owner of currently registered vehicle physical therapy resumption of full time work schedule change of jobs or alteration of educational plans no serious long term impact NO SERIOUS BODILY INJURY summary judgment for defendant Papaiya v. Willy , 73 Bucks Co. L. Rep. 301 (June 29, 2000) Registered vehicle owner whose insurance lapses deemed to have chosen limited tort option. No serious bodily injury under Section 1705 of MVFRL, 75 Pa.C.S. §1705, when no significant long term impact on life; change in job or educational plans due to difficulty stooping, bending or lifting not serious bodily injury. BANKRUPTCY Third Circuit EXEMPTION 11 U.S.C. §522(b)(2)(B) unencumbered share of home equity impending divorce LACK OF GOOD FAITH 11 U.S.C. §707(a) Chapter 7 debtor burden of proof ability and intent to repay dismissal of petition affirmed In re Tamecki , No. 99-4061 (Sept. 27, 2000) Order finding debtor has not shown petition filed in good faith per 11 U.S.C. §707(a) affirmed when debtor acquired sizable consumer debt just before filing for bankruptcy and during pendency of divorce, and seeks exemption for unencumbered share of home equity under 11 U.S.C. §522(b)(2)(B) he anticipates from impending divorce.
Extractions: Many international law scholars have assumed that the rise of international human rights litigation in US courts is an unequivocally positive development. In this essay, I will suggest that, notwithstanding its understandable appeal, this litigation entails significant domestic costs, and possibly international costs as well. These costs, like the benefits of international human rights litigation, are difficult to measure and probably vary from case to case. If nothing else, however, the existence of these costs may suggest that courts should await specific guidance from Congress before allowing further expansions of this litigation.
November 2000 civ. 14) LABOR LAW / REMOVAL Prazak v. Local 1 intl. did not occur until after theeffective date of the AntiTerrorism and Effective death penalty Act, that http://www.usca-portal.com/nov2000.htm
Extractions: November 1 - 30, 2000 Home January February March ... December PUBLISHABLE OPINIONS 1) SECURITIES FRAUD: Lapidus v. Hecht , 99-15835 (9th Cir. Nov. 13, 2000). To establish standing in an action under the Investment Company Act in connection with a trust's management of a mutual fund where the shareholders seeking standing sought to recover losses sustained by the mutual fund as a result of short sales made without shareholder approval, it was not necessary for the shareholders seeking standing to allege an injury distinct from that suffered by the shareholders generally if the alleged injury is predicated upon a violation of a shareholder's voting rights. Thompson (author) , T.G. Nelson, and Silverman, Circuit Judges. J. Tabacco of San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants; I. Traugott of San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. (Download the full text of this decision at www.ce9.uscourts.gov/ Cook v. Robbins (author) , Circuit Judges, and Duplantier, District Judge. H. Romero of Bellevue, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant / cross-appellee; P. Selvin of Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees / cross-appellants. (Download the full text of this decision at www.ce9.uscourts.gov/
December 2001 Rawlinson (author), Circuit Judges, and Pogue (dissenting), Court of intl. limitationsperiod of the Antiterrorism and Effective death penalty Act of R. civ. http://www.usca-portal.com/2001/Dec2001.htm
Extractions: Copies of decisions, briefs, and other documents in the public record are available through Judicial Update. December 1 - 31,2001 Vol.XVIII, No. 12 Home January February March ... December PUBLISHABLE OPINIONS 1) ANTITRUST: Lucas Automotive Engineering v. Bridgestone / Firestone, Inc., 99-56761 (9th Cir. Dec. 26, 2001). Evidence suggesting that manufacturers, retailers, and purchasers recognize original equipment major brand vintage tires as a separate economic entity from private label tires was sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the authentic nature of original equipment major brand tires results in a distinct customer base and pricing structure that would not respond to monopolistic conduct by purchasing private label brand tires as a substitute. Boochever and Silverman, Circuit Judges, and George (author) , District Judge. M. Blecher of Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant; K. Goss of Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee. (Download the full text of this decision at www.ce9.uscourts.gov/
Spring 2003 Course Listing 81000 The death penalty JJ R, 6 15-8 15 pm , Rm. 55384 C E. 57610 -Applied Hydraulicsin civ Eng C 74900 -Human rights/ Soc Mvmnts 20 C GC W, 6 30-8 30 http://www.gc.cuny.edu/student_web/PDFconverted.htm
Extractions: All Links. . . Academic Calendar Academic Counseling Humanitarian Law Administration Admin Law Review Admissions Alumni Relations American Jurist AU Int'l Law Review AU Journal of Gender, Social AU Law Review Appleseed Application (JD) Benefits Blackboard Calendar of Events Calendar, Academic Career Services Humanitarian Law Childcare (AUCDC) Chile Summer Program Civil Practice Clinic Class Cancellations/Notices Class Schedule Clinical Legal Educators Directory Clinical Program Commencement Communications Development Law Clinic Contact WCL Continuing Legal Education Counseling Course Catalog Course Schedule Criminal Justice Clinic Current Students Curricular Information Dean, Office of the Development Office Directions to WCL Directory Disabilities Support Diversity Service Docket, The Domestic Violence Clinic Dual Degree Programs E-Commerce Employers Employment Opportunities Environmental Law Europe Summer Program Events Calendar Evidence Project Exam Schedule Externships Facilities Management Faculty Faculty Projects Faculty Resources Financial Aid Founders Gender Studies Give Online Global Partnerships Graduation Requirements Haifa Summer Program Health Services Hispanic Law Conference Holiday Schedule Hong Kong Exchange Honor Code Housing Humphrey Fellowship Program Human Resources Human Rights Human Rights Brief International Legal Studies Program ILSP Student Association Independent Study Program Intellectual Property Law Clinic Inter-American Human Rights Digest International Human Rights Law Clinic International Law JD/MA
Montana Supreme Court Decisions consent statute 96281* 12/9/96* intl Brotherhood of Negligence *Wrongful death Venue94 of license is a civil administrative sanction, not a criminal penalty. http://www.mtbizlaw.com/cases96v2.htm
Civil Liberties Docket - Vol. III, No. 4 - July, 1958 (SD NY, civ. Rogers v. intl. Decision reversed, on ground penalty of discharge unreasonablein view of nature of offense, ie, failure to cooperate with City's http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/meiklejohn/meik-3_4/meik-3_4-3.html
Extractions: The DOCKET is published 4 times each year, October to June, by the National Committee on Constitutional Rights and Liberties, Osmond K. Fraenkel, chairman, Ann Fagan Ginger, editor. Concluded cases described in Vol. II will not be mentioned in this issue except to give citations of law review articles and case notes. Pending cases in which there has been no change in status since the last description are listed below and marked with an *. Pending cases in which changes have occurred since the last issue will show the page references of the previous descriptions in Vol. II and Vol. III, Nos. 1, 2, and 3. I.
Civil Liberties Docket - Vol. IV, No. 4 - August, 1959 SD NY, civ. of Insurance, as Liquidator of intl. subject to penalty (5 weeks loss ofcompensation) for refusal to go for job interview with Gov't. agency which http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/meiklejohn/meik-4_4/meik-4_4-4.html
Extractions: The DOCKET is published 4 times each year, October to July, by the National Committee on Constitutional Rights and Liberties, Osmond K. Fraenkel, chairman, Ann Fagan Ginger, editor. Vol. IV, No. 1 contained complete descriptions of all cases pending in July 1958 or instituted prior to November 1959. Pending cases in which there has been no change in status since the last description are listed below and marked with an *. Pending cases in which changes have occurred since the last issue will show the page reference of the previous description. Cases concluded prior to July 1958 are not mentioned in Vol. IV except to give citations of law review articles and case notes. I.
Extractions: How to Avoid It The bottom line is that it is not enough for an employer to merely have a complaint policy, wait for complaints, then perhaps discipline offenders. Such a policy is willful and itself deliberate misconduct. Worse, the offender may be believed over the victim!! The proper solution, the legal solution, as voluminous case law shows, is to not hire the foreseeable offenders in the first place. In law, the duty is to be pro-active, prevent incidents, prevent them far in advance, indeed, prevent hiring foreseeable perpetrators. This site has data showing why and how to not hire persons foreseeably dangerous to themselves, others, and property. The concept term is avoiding " negligent hiring ." Others may talk or write in theoretical terms. This site is more specific. It focuses, and thus tells you who is disproportionately likely to commit offenses, which include employment offenses. Surgeon General Reports 1964 to present show that smoking is dangerous to self, others, and property. Cigarettes contain and emit toxic chemicals (Toxic Tobacco Smoke, "TTS," or, sometimes, ETS) far above legal limits. The pertinent legal adjective is "
ELIZABETH J. CROWE Vs. MICHAEL FONG. from Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' intl. After the death of Justice Flannery,Justices Porada, Dreben Also, no penalty was imposed for noncompliance, on http://www.socialaw.com/appslip/95p637.html
Extractions: Docket No.: 95-P-637 Parties: County: Essex. Dates: January 28, 1999. - March 10, 1999. Present: School and School Committee, Contempt, Strike by teachers. Labor, Strike by public employees, Contempt. Contempt. Damages, Contempt. Civil action commenced in the Superior Court Department on November 2, 1994. The case was heard by Elizabeth B. Donovan, J., and a motion for reconsideration was heard by her. Jeffrey W. Jacobsen for the defendant. John B. Cochran for the plaintiff. Victoria B. Caldwell for the intervener. GILLERMAN, J. A Superior Court judge found the Salem Teachers Union (union) in civil contempt for failure to comply with a temporary restraining order issued by the judge on November 2, 1994, ordering the union to cease and desist from encouraging or condoning any strike of teachers and paraprofessionals at the Salem public schools. On appeal, the union argues that the judge erred in treating the alleged contempt as a nonjury civil proceeding, rather than a criminal one, that the prospective daily fine imposed by the judge for noncompliance was arbitrary and oppressive, and that the Salem School Committee (school committee) should not have been allowed to intervene in the contempt proceedings. At the November 7 hearing, the judge, without objection by the union, allowed the motion of the school committee to intervene. Counsel for the union then presented a motion for a jury trial on the contempt complaint, citing International Union, United Mine Wrkrs. v. Bagwell, 512 U.S. 821 (1994). The judge denied the motion, and the parties proceeded to an evidentiary hearing.
