1. Death Penalty Information (from: Http://www.soci.niu.edu/~critcrim) Anticapital punishment Resources from the ASC's Critical Criminology DivisionCategory Society Issues Death Penalty Organizations Against...... Litigation and Legislation. US Supreme Court Decisions in recapital punishment. general Information on the Death Penalty. http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~critcrim/dp/dp.html

Anti-Capital Punishment Resources from the ASC's Critical Criminology Division ASC RESOLUTION ON THE DEATH PENALTY: Be it resolved that because social science research has demonstrated the death penalty to be racist in application and social science research has found no consistent evidence of crime deterrence through execution, the ASC publicly condemns this form of punishment and urges its members to use their professional skills in legislatures and the courts to seek a speedy abolition of this form of punishment (ASC Annual Meeting, Montreal, 1987). (SEE ALSO the American Bar Association call for a moratorium and the statement of the Catholic Bishops of Texas Department of Justice General Information and Statistics Frequently Asked Questions Papers, fact sheets, and Information on the Death Penalty Death Row Inmates/Executions by Race/Victim Death Penalty News and Updates Pending Executions Papers and Commentary Useful Information from Amnesty International Ratifications of International Treaties on the Death Penalty (ACT 50/03/99, March 1999) Death Sentences and Executions in 1998 (ACT 51/01/99, April 1999) Litigation and Legislation U.S. Supreme Court Decisions in re Capital Punishment

2. Capital Punishment [Internet Encyclopedia Of Philosophy] The issue of capital punishment involves determining whether the execution of criminals is ever justified.Category Society Philosophy Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy...... permissible. Philosophical defenses of capital punishment typicallydraw from more general discussions of punishment. The issue http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/c/capitalp.htm

Capital Punishment The applied ethics issue of capital punishment involves determining whether the execution of criminals is ever justified, and, if so under what circumstances it is permissible. Philosophical defenses of capital punishment typically draw from more general discussions of punishment. The issue of corrective justice in legal philosophy distinguishes between two principal theories of punishment: utilitarian and retributive. Accordingly, defenses of capital punishment are usually either utilitarian or retributive in nature. By contrast, most criticisms of capital punishment seek to expose flaws in popular justifications of capital punishment. Thus, in the absence of any good reason for executing a criminal, the critic of capital punishment concludes that the criminal should be allowed to live. Table of Contents (Clicking on the links below will take you to that part of this article) Utilitarian Arguments Concerning Capital Punishment Retributive Arguments Concerning Capital Punishment Other Arguments for Capital Punishment Direct Attacks on Capital Punishment Utilitarian Arguments Concerning Capital Punishment Perhaps the most common defenses of capital punishment are on utilitarian grounds. For utilitarians, punishment in general is justified only insofar as it creates a greater balance of happiness vs. unhappiness. From the utilitarian perspective, then, capital punishment is justified if it (1) prevents the criminal from repeating his crime; or (2) deters crime by discouraging would-be offenders. For, both of these contribute to a greater balance of happiness in society. There are several immediate problems with this line of reasoning. First, the burden of proof is on the defender of capital punishment to show that the same effects could not be accomplished with less severe punishment, such as life imprisonment. This is especially pertinent since the goal of utilitarianism is to reduce as much unhappiness as possible and this entails imposing the least severe of two possible punishments when everything else is equal. Italian political theorist

3. Capital Punishment in federal capital punishment cases; also includes information on the prosecutors' and the attorney general's decisions http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/rights/hrpage/cp.htm

Human Rights 7 March 2003 POLICY Key Documents Key Reports RESOURCES Evolution of the Death Penalty Current Legislation Web sites Current Issues in the News ... U.S. Outlines Death Penalty and Case of Texas Inmate for OSCE Council Davidson's statement to OSCE Permanent Council Deputy Chief of the U.S. Mission to the OSCE Douglas Davidson addressed the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna January 23 on the issue of capital punishment in the United States, in reply to concerns raised about the case of John (Jackie) Elliott, who was convicted of the 1986 rape and murder of a woman in East Austin, Texas, and is scheduled to be executed February 4. Complete Text Death Penalty Legislation in Congress 108th Congress National Death Penalty Moratorium Act of 2003, S.132 Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act of 2003, S. 402 Justice Enhancement and Domestic Security Act of 2003, S.22(see Title VI, Innocence Protection Act) 107th Congress Death Penalty Integrity Act of 2002, S.2739 Confidence in Criminal Justice Act of 2002, S.2446 Capital Defense Counsel Standards Act of 2002, S.2442 Criminal Justice Integrity and Innocence Protection Act of 2001, S. 800 ... -Hearing: "Protecting the innocent: ensuring competent counsel in death penalty cases," June 27, 2001, PDF file, 138 pages Innocence Protection Act of 2001, H.R. 912

4. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT University student supplies an outline pertaining to the hotly debated topic, listing both sides of the story and providing data graphs. of fact concerning capital punishment fall into three general areas does capital punishment save money, freeing social http://www.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/research/CapPunish

Lloyd Sealy Library Page 1 of 3 John Jay College of Criminal Justice CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Books from the Lloyd Sealy Library Collections The Lloyd Sealy Library has developed a strong criminal justice collection over the last three decades. Our collection is particularly strong in the area of capital punishment, ranging from 18th century publications to the latest human rights reports. This bibliography was created to accompany the exhibition Condemned: Inside the Sing-Sing Death House , curated by Scott Christiansen and on display in John Jay College during Spring 2000. The books listed here are indexed in the library catalog under the major Library of Congress subject heading capital punishment . We have not included journal articles in this bibliography. We hope that the reader will be intrigued by the works listed, and be encouraged to consult the library catalog and indexes to discover the full extent of the valuable materials available. The bibliography was compiled by Professors Maria Kiriakova and Ellen Sexton, March 2000.

5. PC(USA) - Presbyterian 101 - Capital Punishment In 1959, the 171st general Assembly, believing that capital punishment cannot becondoned by an interpretation of the Bible based upon the revelation of God's http://www.pcusa.org/101/101-capital.htm

Home Presbyterian 101 Social Issues Capital Punishment Presbyterian General Assemblies have been concerned not only for the issue of capital punishment, but also for those imprisoned. The major policy statements of the past forty years have come in 1959, 1977, and 1978. In 1959, the 171st General Assembly, "believing that capital punishment cannot be condoned by an interpretation of the Bible based upon the revelation of God's love in Jesus Christ," called on Christians to "seek the redemption of evil doers and not their death," and noted that "the use of the death penalty tends to brutalize the society that condones it." In 1977, the 189th General Assembly called upon its members to: "a. Work to prevent the execution of persons now under sentence of death and further use of the death penalty; b. Work against attempts to reinstate the death penalty in state and federal law, and where such laws exist, to work for their repeal; c. Work for the improvement of the justice system to make less radical means available for dealing with persons who are a serious threat to themselves and to the safety and welfare of society."

6. Bureau Of Justice Statistics Publications Alphabetical Listing NCJ 158023 capital punishment 1993, 12/94. data on disposition of 366,000 contractcases involving 1.3 million litigants in State general jurisdiction courts http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pubalp2.htm

Bureau of Justice Statistics BJS home page What's new See also - Periodic reports Paper only publications CD-ROMs for sale Survey questionnaires Bureau of Justice Statistics Publications This is an alphabetical list of BJS publications that are in electronic formats. To view an abstract and connect to electronic versions, click on the titles listed. Subscribe to JUSTSTATS , for email notices of new statistical materials from BJS, the FBI, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention upon release. If you know the title click on the first letter of the title: A B C D ... Y A Age Patterns of Victims of Serious Violent Crime , 8/97. Presents data from the redesigned NCVS that examines violent crime across the general population, ages 12 or older. NCJ 162031 Age Patterns of Violent Victimization, 1976-2000 , 02/02. Examines data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports on trends in violent crime by age in the United States. NCJ 190104 Alcohol and Crime , 4/98. Provides an overview of national information on the role of alcohol in violent victimization and its use among those convicted of crimes, including victim perceptions of alcohol use by offenders at the time of the crime. NCJ 168632

7. Capital Punishment: 1961 UUA General Resolution Unitarian Universalist Association capital punishment 1961 general Resolution WHEREAS,respect for the value of every human life must be incorporated into our http://www.uua.org/actions/criminal-justice/61capital.html

Unitarian Universalist Association Capital Punishment 1961 General Resolution WHEREAS, respect for the value of every human life must be incorporated into our laws if it is to be observed by our people; and WHEREAS, modern justice should concern itself with rehabilitation, not retribution; and WHEREAS, it has not been proved that fear of capital punishment is a deterrent to crime; and WHEREAS, human judgements are not infallible, and no penalty should be used which cannot be revoked in case of error; and WHEREAS, capital punishment has not always been used impartially among all economic and racial groups in America; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Unitarian Universalist Association urges its churches and fellowships in the United States and Canada to exert all reasonable efforts toward the elimination of capital punishment; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That copies of this resolution be sent to the Governors of all states in which capital punishment has not yet been eliminated, and to the Canadian Minister of Justice. Criminal Justice Actions Main Index Search Actions Unitarian Universalist Association Home Contact Us Search Site Map 1822 accesses to this page since October 6, 1999

8. Close Up Foundation: Captal Punishment In The United States Subtitled Arguments for Life and Death, this report introduces both sides and produces and explains data from its study. Lists references. between support for capital punishment and attitudes favouring retribution for crimes in general. Vidmar measured http://www.closeup.org/punish.htm

Close Up Foundation Special Topic Page: Capital Punishment in the United States December 1999 Written and compiled by Sharon C. Smith Photo courtesy of the Virginia Department of Corrections. Close Up Materials on Capital Punishment Historical Overview Policy Arguments Statistics Teaching Activity ... Miscellaneous Historical Overview of Capital Punishment in the United States Introduction Colonial America to the 1780s 1789 to the Early 20th Century The Bill of Rights ... The Death Penalty Around the World Introduction The sentence of death has been an accepted form of justice through the ages. Geography, culture, and the passing of time have varied its form, the offenses for which it has been imposed and its recipients. Today in the United States, capital punishment is an integral part of the criminal justice system. Capital punishment has also remained a perennial "hot button" issue; when the average person is asked if he or she supports the death penalty, that person is likely to give a definitive yes or no answer. Therefore, as the national debate continues, it is important to understand how capital punishment has evolved in the United States. Colonial America to the 1780s James Kendall was the first English colonist executed in the New World in 1608 at the Jamestown settlement.

9. Capital Punishment: 1979 UUA General Resolution capital punishment 1979 general Resolution WHEREAS, general Assemblies of the UnitarianUniversalist Association have opposed capital punishment by resolutions http://www.uua.org/actions/criminal-justice/79capital.html

Unitarian Universalist Association Capital Punishment 1979 General Resolution WHEREAS, General Assemblies of the Unitarian Universalist Association have opposed capital punishment by resolutions in 1961, 1966, and 1974; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned resolutions have urged complete abolition of capital punishment as inconsistent with respect for human life; for its retributive, discriminatory, and non-deterrent character; and opposed its restoration or continuance in any form; and WHEREAS, the State of Florida has declared its intent to proceed with the executions of those under the capital sentence in Florida prisons, numbering more than one hundred, and having begun with the execution of John Spenkelink on May 25, 1979; and WHEREAS, the Florida example may become precedent for a new wave of capital punishment in numerous other states; BE IT RESOLVED: That the 1979 General Assembly of the Unitarian Universalist Association urges the Governor of the State of Florida to commute all existing death sentences; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the General Assembly urges Governors of all other states similarly to commute death sentences and to prevent the restoration or continuance of capital punishment in any form.

10. Capital Punishment of Columbia; May 29, 2001The general Board of Church and Society Continuesto Oppose capital punishment Advocacy Letters; May 02, 2001 http://www.umc-gbcs.org/capital_punish.htm

Capital Punishment Ken Fealing Program Director KFealing@ umc-gbcs.org United Methodist Position on Capital Punishment Join worldwide moratorium on the death penalty For more information, go to Moratorium Campaign Articles November 27, 2000 Former inmate joins speakers in condemning death penalty November 27, 2000 President asked to stop first federal execution in 37 years May 2000 DC Forced to Accept Death Penalty May 2000 United Methodists Against the Death Penalty Remembering Human Rights Day Press Statement June 20, 2001 Two United Methodist Agencies Join Supreme Court Brief Opposing Execution of the Mentally Disabled February 18, 2000 The General Board of Church and Society Urges Attorney General Janet Reno Not to Impose the Federal Death Penalty on the District of Columbia May 29, 2001 The General Board of Church and Society Continues to Oppose Capital Punishment Advocacy Letters May 02, 2001

11. Commission On Capital Punishment | Reports CHAPTER 5 – PROSECUTORS’ SELECTION OF CASES FOR CAPITALPUNISHMENT, CHAPTER 14 – general RECOMMENDATIONS, http://www.idoc.state.il.us/ccp/ccp/reports/commission_report/

Report of the Commission on Capital Punishment April 2002 2 MB Instructions on how to print or save PDF's PREAMBLE 121 KB MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION ON CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 93 KB COMMISSION STAFF 84 KB ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 87 KB TABLE OF CONTENTS 86 KB 170 KB 191 KB 164 KB ... 179 KB CONCLUSION 60 KB BIBLIOGRAPHY 119 KB APPENDIX 51 KB CONTENTS 53 KB 2. Illinois Death Penalty statute 59 KB 3. Eligibility factors and legislative amendments through 2001 72 KB 4. Summary of state capital murder provisions and aggravating/mitigating factor provisions 90 KB 5. Summary Table 1 - Reversals in Illinois Death penalty cases 55 KB 6. Summary Table 2 - Resentencings in Illinois Death penalty cases

12. Catholic Social Teaching -- Capital Punishment Group of US Bishops expressed their stance in 1980 against killing as a penalty, covering Christian values, inherent problems and its purposes. general are retribution, deterrence, and reform. Reform or rehabilitation of the criminal cannot serve as a justification for capital punishment, http://www.osjspm.org/cst/cappun.htm

OSJ Home CST Home Documents Themes ... Search Statement on Capital Punishment U.S. Bishops, November, 1980 Other Links Other statements on capital punishment. Catholics Against Capital Punishment Other resources on capital punishment. Introduction In 1974, out of a commitment to the value and dignity of human life, the U.S. Catholic Conference, by a substantial majority, voted to declare its opposition to capital punishment. As a former president of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops pointed out in 1977, the issue of capital punishment involves both "profound legal and political questions as well as 'important moral and religious issues,'" And so we find that this issue continues to provoke public controversy and to raise moral questions that trouble many. This is particularly true in the aftermath of widely publicized executions in Utah and Florida and as a result of public realization that they are awaiting execution in various prisons. The resumption of capital punishment after a long moratorium which began in 1967, is the result of a series of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. In the first of these decisions

13. Commission On Capital Punishment | Commission Members with distinction, both as a member of the Illinois general Assembly and as a criminaldefense lawyer, and is wellacquainted with the capital punishment system http://www.idoc.state.il.us/ccp/ccp/member_info.html

Chairman, Judge Frank McGarr Now in private practice with a focus on mediation and arbitration, Judge McGarr served as a federal prosecutor and as the First Assistant Illinois Attorney General before spending 18 distinguished years on the federal bench. He served as Chief Judge of the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois between 1981 and 1986. Co-Chair, Senator Paul Simon Senator Simon has served the people of Illinois with distinction, both as a member of the Illinois General Assembly and the United States Congress. Since he retired from the United States Senate in 1997, Senator Simon has been a professor at Southern Illinois University and Director of its Public Policy Institute. Co-Chair, Thomas P. Sullivan An accomplished litigator, Mr. Sullivan served as United States Attorney for the Northern often called upon lend his legal expertise, judgment and leadership on public interest committees. Former Deputy Governor Matthew R. Bettenhausen, Member and Executive Director

14. Capital Punishment Links and essays focusing on the philosophical, moral and practical issues/concerns ofcapital punishment. Kentucky Dept. of Public Advocacy general death penalty http://users.hsonline.net/beamer/cpun.html

FOR MY RESEARCH PAPER CLICK HERE Capital Punishment Links Captial Punishment Follow the next links to check out a sample term paper I found for capital punishment for anyone having problems with getting started. Term paper 1st half.. Term paper 2nd half.. Capital Punishment Statement by the Catholic Bishops of Texas on Capital Punishment ... Abolition-NOW.(Death penalty link) Other Sources of Information on the Death Penalty The Death Penalty Information Center does not endorse any of the organizations listed below nor does it guarantee the accuracy of the information posted at these sites. Similarly, we do not claim that these organizations endorse DPIC. Abolitionist Groups International / National Abolition Now - wide array of death penalty information, including statistics, issues, columns and articles written from death row, and news forum Amnesty International - tracks death penalty internationally, includes statistics and general information, country reports Amensty International-Group 75 - test your knowledge of the death penalty by taking a death penalty quiz, also contains up-to-date information and articles on what's happening on this issue around the country Italian Section of Amnesty International - international death penalty documents, appeals and information

15. Criminal Justice - Moratorium On Capital Punishment Directs the Stated Clerk of the general Assembly to communicate the call for an immediatemoratorium and our continuing opposition to capital punishment to the http://horeb.pcusa.org/crim_justice/capitalpunishment.htm

PCUSA Criminal Justice Moratorium on Capital Punishment 212th General Assembly (2000) Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) There is strong evidence that the death penalty is applied in a racist manner. In 1987, in McCleskey v. Kemp , the United States Supreme Court refused to act on data demonstrating the continuing reality of racial bias. Justice William Brennan in his dissenting opinion said, It is tempting to pretend that minorities on death row share a fate in no way connected to our own, that our treatment of them sounds no echoes beyond the chambers in which they die. Such an illusion is ultimately corrosive, for the reverberations of injustice are not so easily confined. McCleskey v. Kemp , 481 U.S. 279, 344 (1987) [Brennan, J. Dissenting]) In 1990, the United States General Accounting Office reported a pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in charging, sentencing, and imposition of the death penalty: Nationwide, 82 percent of those put to death have been convicted of murdering a white person even though people of color are the victims in more than half of all homicides. In 82 percent of their studies, race of the victim was found to influence the likelihood of being charged with capital murder or receiving a death sentence, i.e., those who murdered whites were found to be more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks. This finding was remarkably consistent across data sets, states, data collection methods, and analytic techniques. The finding held for high, medium, and low quality studies.

16. Lisa Madigan - Attorney General 15, the Governor's Commission on capital punishment released its report. The ChicagoTribune asked the candidates for Governor and Attorney general to write an http://www.lisamadigan.org/issues/capital_punishment.htm

the General Election!" // > Print Friendly Response to the Governor's Commission on Capital Punishment On Monday, April 15, the Governor's Commission on Capital Punishment released its report. The Chicago Tribune asked the candidates for Governor and Attorney General to write an Op-Ed on the recommendations made within the report. Sen. Madigan's response was published in the Tribune on Friday, April 26. For decades most Illinois citizens, prosecutors, judges and juries have believed that the death penalty is the appropriate punishment for those who commit the most brutal and heinous murders. I agree. Clearly, though, the wrongful convictions and death sentences of 13 men have shaken public confidence in our system of capital punishment. Over two years ago, Governor Ryan courageously and correctly halted executions and called for a much needed, comprehensive study of Illinois' death penalty. Now that the Governor's Since reinstating the death penalty in Illinois, more inmates on Death Row have been proven innocent than have been executed. Commission has completed its report, we must act in this legislative session to implement reforms.

17. S. C. Department Of Corrections Capital Punishment as to the punishment, Woodson v. North Carolina (1976). In light of the foregoingdecisions of the US Supreme Court, the State Attorney general opined that the http://www.state.sc.us/scdc/capitalpunishment/capitalpunishment.htm

Legal Background of Death Penalty in South Carolina For a number of years, South Carolina operated under a fairly typical death penalty statute which provided for the ultimate penalty for a number of crimes including, but not limited to, murder, rape and kidnapping. The statute predicated the imposition of the death penalty in those situations where the jury made a finding of guilt without an affirmative recommendation of mercy Beginning in 1962, there was a moratorium on executions nationally even though death penalty statutes remained in effect. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Furman v. Georgia, held that the imposition of the death penalty was unconstitutional in those situations where either the court or the jury had practically unfettered discretion to impose the ultimate penalty. The Furman case, in effect, declared most death penalty statutes, including that of South Carolina, in effect to be unconstitutional. In light of the foregoing decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, the State Attorney General opined that the South Carolina mandatory death penalty for specified circumstances is clearly unconstitutional (75-86 Op. Atty., Gen. #4388, page 224). In response to this ruling of the Attorney General, the General Assembly, in Act 177, Acts in Joint Resolutions of 1977, reenacted our current death penalty statute, which has been codified at Section 16-3-20 Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976. The current statute has been declared constitutional, both by the State Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court, State v. Shaw (1979). It was under this statutory scheme that the death penalty was reimposed in South Carolina in January, 1985.

18. United Methodist News Service Backgrounder On Capital Punishment * *. A new statement titled In Opposition to capital punishment was adoptedby the general Conference in 2000 and now appears in the Book of Resolutions http://umns.umc.org/backgrounders/capitalpunishment.html

Who sets policy for the United Methodist Church? Only the General Conference can speak officially for the United Methodist Church. Every four years, delegates at each conference revise the Book of Discipline and Book of Resolutions . The Social Principles, in both books, are described as a "prayerful and thoughtful effort on the part of the General Conference to speak to the human issues in the contemporary world from a sound biblical and theological foundation as historically demonstrated in United Methodist traditions." The Book of Resolutions is not legally binding but serves as a guide for the church for reference, encouragement, study and support. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (Updated 6/01) The United Methodist Church opposes the death penalty and urges its abolition. The Methodist Church, a predecessor of today's United Methodist Church, adopted opposition to capital punishment as an official position in 1956. Current statements follow. The Social Principles, revised by the most recent General Conference in 2000, includes sections on "Basic Freedoms and Human Rights" and "Criminal and Restorative Justice."

19. 1995/57. Capital Punishment Having considered the fifth quinquennial report of the Secretarygeneral on capitalpunishment and the implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing the http://www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/res/1995/eres1995-57.htm

United Nations Resolution 1995/57 Economic and Social Council 57th plenary meeting 28 July 1995 1995/57. Capital punishment The Economic and Social Council, Recalling General Assembly resolutions 2857 (XXVI) of 20 December 1971, 32/61 of 8 December 1977, 39/118 of 14 December 1984 and 44/128 of 15 December 1989, Recalling its resolutions 1745 (LIV) of 16 May 1973, 1930 (LVIII) of 6 May 1975, 1984/50 of 25 May 1984 and 1990/51 of 24 July 1990, Having considered the fifth quinquennial report of the Secretary-General on capital punishment and the implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing the protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty, 1/ submitted to it in pursuance of its resolution 1990/51 and its decision 1994/206 of 3 February 1994, Conscious of the fact that only 63 Governments replied to the questionnaire which the Secretary-General sent to them asking them to provide the information required for the preparation of the fifth quinquennial report, 1. Invites Member States to reply to the questionnaire which the Secretary-General will send them with a view to the preparation of the sixth quinquennial report in the year 2000, providing him with the information requested;

20. Death Penalty Links Oregon Death Row; South Carolina - capital punishment - general information; Texas- Offenders on Death Row- death row stats, list of death row inmates with http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/links.htm

"Most of us continue to believe that those who show utter contempt for human life by committing remorseless, premeditated murder justly forfeit the right to their own life." Alex Kozinski, U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Pro Death Penalty or Neutral Sites: The Death Penalty - a Defence WWW Death Penalty Links an incredible collection of DP links from the Clark County Indiana Prosecutor The New American - Issues in Focus - Capital Punishment - a great collection of opinion articles DP Info - lots of information, news and links Capital Punishment in the UK - detailed history of the death penalty in Britain Capital Punishment an opinion page Capital Punishment, 1995 A report from the Bureau of Justice Statistics Capital Punishment: Give It A Chance The Costs of Capital Punishment from the victim's point of view Death Row Book Impeach Judge John Nixon A Federal judge who uses his position to illegally advance his own personal opinion against the death penalty. Justice Against Crime Talking A page built by a wonderful man whose daughter was murdered, and whose

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z

Page 1     1-20 of 102    1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | 6  | Next 20