Geometry.Net - the online learning center
Home  - Basic_K - Kansas Boards Of Education

e99.com Bookstore
  
Images 
Newsgroups
Page 3     41-60 of 100    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20
A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

         Kansas Boards Of Education:     more books (100)
  1. Some aspects of the socio-economic status of board of education members in Kingman County Kansas (Research report / Municipal University of Wichita) by K. C Pohl, 1956
  2. Archeological monitoring and limited testing during 2001-2003 at the Monroe Elementary School and playground field, Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site, Shawnee County, Kansas. by Jay T Sturdevant, 2004
  3. Brown V. Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution (Landmark Law Cases and American Society) by Robert J. Cottrol, Raymond T. D Amond, et all 2003-10
  4. Archeological Monitoring and Limited Testing During 2001-2003 at the Monroe Elementary School and Playground Field, Brown V. Board of Education National Historic Site, Shawnee County, Kansas by Jay T Sturdevant, 2004-01-01
  5. Brown Vs. Board of Education by RobertJCotrol, 2003
  6. Buildings and Structures in Topeka, Kansas: Topeka State Hospital, Brown V. Board of Education National Historic Site
  7. National Historic Landmark (Kansas): Santa Fe Trail, Brown V. Board of Education National Historic Site, Council Grove, Fort Leavenworth (German Edition)
  8. BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA: An entry from Charles Scribner's Sons' <i>Dictionary of American History</i> by Mark V. Tushnet, 2003
  9. The Quest for Citizenship: African American and Native American Education in Kansas, 1880-1935 by Kim Warren, 2010-09-13
  10. Geographie (Kansas): Santa Fe Trail, Ozark-Plateau, Brown V. Board of Education National Historic Site, State Parks in Kansas (German Edition)
  11. Annual report on school spending: a school board in Kansas is hawking extra property on eBay while districts in Florida are pocketing extra cash from the ... An article from: District Administration by Laura K. Dianis, 2004-01-01
  12. National Historic Sites in Kansas: Fort Scott National Historic Site, Topeka State Hospital, Brown V. Board of Education National Historic Site
  13. The greed within them: The real story behind the political corruption and deceit of the Kansas City Missouri School District by Leroy Hyrne, 1998
  14. Service program bridges generational divide; Kansas: Spring Hill Unified School District 230.: An article from: School Administrator

41. What The Alliance Will Do
principals, administrators, school boards, state boards of education of highqualitymathematics education for all For example, kansas has created a kansas
http://www.learningfirst.org/alliancewhat.html
WHAT THE ALLIANCE DOES
The Learning First Alliance represents an unprecedented, self-initiated commitment by its members to work in concert to improve student learning. The Alliance will strive to deliver a common message to all parts of the education system, align priorities, share and disseminate success stories, encourage collaboration at every level, and work toward long-term systemic change based on solid research evidence.
Alliance Activities:
The Learning First Alliance is dedicated to learning from and responding to the people who provide public education on a daily basis, the members of our affiliate organizations. These teachers, principals, administrators, school board members, and parents see the challenges public education faces every day. Many have found ways to successfully raise student achievement. Others know change is needed, but don't know where to start reform in a system that seems bigger than they are. The Alliance is dedicated to helping those institutions and people who provide and govern public education work together to find the best way to respond to local challenges. National Leadership and Collaboration In January, 1998, the Alliance held its first Summit, bringing together more than 100 delegates from the Alliance organizations across the country. Committing to an intensive focus on improving reading and mathematics achievement, the Summit delegates determined joint objectives, shared best practices, and explored the most effective means of working together long-term to bring about real impact on student achievement.

42. Links To State Education Boards
March 19, 2003. State education boards. Iowa, (www.state.ia.us/main/addressbooks/ADeducate/index.html). kansas, (www.ksbe.state.ks.us).
http://www.smarterkids.com/rescenter/state_ed-boards.asp
April 8, 2003
State Education Boards
If you want to keep up with everything educational in your state - resources, standards, parenting information, and more - go right to the source. Every state in the union (plus the District of Columbia) has an online home. Find your state below. Use the Index:
A
B C D E F G H I J K L M N ... P Q R S T U ... W X Y Z
Alabama www.alsde.edu Alaska www.educ.state.ak.us Arizona ade.state.az.us Arkansas arkedu.state.ar.us California goldmine.cde.ca.gov Colorado www.cde.state.co.us Connecticut www.state.ct.us/sde Delaware www.doe.state.de.us District of Columbia www.k12.dc.us/dcps/home.html Florida www.firn.edu/doe Georgia www.doe.k12.ga.us Hawaii doe.k12.hi.us Idaho www.sde.state.id.us/Dept Illinois www.isbe.state.il.us Indiana www.doe.state.in.us Iowa www.state.ia.us/main/addressbooks/
ADeducate/index.html
Kansas www.ksbe.state.ks.us Kentucky www.kde.state.ky.us Louisiana www.doe.state.la.us/DOE/asps/home.asp Maine www.state.me.us/education/homepage.htm Maryland www.msde.state.md.us

43. MEAC: Educational Resources For Kansas
State boards for Vocational education are eligible to The point of contact for theseprograms and services serving kansas is Mr. Don Strait Team
http://mdac.educ.ksu.edu/MDAC/services/region/ks.html
Educational Resources for Kansas
Regional Office
The U.S. Department of Education maintains 10 regional offices throughout the country. These offices represent the Department's programs and interests on a regional basis. The Secretary's Regional Representative (SRR) and staff conduct Departmental business on a myriad of issues in their assigned states. The following offices have representatives in each regional office:
  • The Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) handles questions related to student financial assistance programs.
  • The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) assists constituents with rehabilitative services.
  • The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) responds to questions about and reviews complaints related to civil rights issues.
  • The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) investigates potential violations of law and conducts audits on Department-funded programs.
  • The Office of Management (OM) has personnel offices or representatives in each of the regional offices.

44. Other Boards Across The United States
boards of Higher education in the United States ALASKA System of Georgia ILLINOISBoard of Higher education IOWA State Board of Regents kansas Board of
http://www.regents.state.la.us/Board/boardsus.htm
Boards of Higher Education in the United States ALASKA Commission on Postsecondary Education
ALABAMA Commission on Higher Education

ARIZONA Board of Regents

ARKANSAS Department of Higher Education
...
WISCONSIN University of Wisconsin System

Baton Rouge, Louisiana

45. HireBio | Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Jobs And Resume Tools In Sales, Researc
State Pharmacy boards If you need more information on education requirements, licensure 317)2342067 Fax (317) 233-4236 www.in.gov/hpb/boards/isbp. Iowa. kansas.
http://www.hirebio.com/home/medlinks/pharmacyboards/
Print This Page
Browser Update Needed
Your browser needs to be updated. hireBio makes extensive use of JavaScript, style sheets and other features of DHTML (Dynamic HTML). If you keep this version of your browser, you will not be able to use all of the features of hireBio. You can easily update your browser to the newest version by clicking on one of these links: Please note that we are currently experience intermittent issues with Mozilla browsers, and are working to resolve the issue. Return Home
Print This Page Privacy Legal

46. CNN - Kansas School Board's Evolution Ruling Angers Science Community - August 1
CNNCategory Society Religion and Spirituality Origins and Creation...... CNN) A decision this week by the kansas Board of back 100 years in science teachingand education, says Barry is left to the local school boards and to
http://www.cnn.com/US/9908/12/kansas.evolution.flap/

MAIN PAGE
WORLD ASIANOW U.S. ... news quiz
CNN WEB SITES: TIME INC. SITES: Go To ... Time.com People Money Fortune EW MORE SERVICES: video on demand video archive audio on demand news email services ...
pagenet

DISCUSSION: message boards chat feedback
SITE GUIDES: help contents search
FASTER ACCESS: europe japan
WEB SERVICES:
Kansas school board's evolution ruling angers science community
The Kansas State School Board voted Wednesday to remove the teaching of evolution from the state's science curriculum VIDEO CNN's Brian Cabell looks at the dispute over teaching evolution
Windows Media MESSAGE BOARD:

Defending Darwin

August 12, 1999 Web posted at: 10:08 p.m. EDT (0208 GMT) From Correspondent Brian Cabell TOPEKA, Kansas (CNN) A decision this week by the Kansas Board of Education to delete the teaching of evolution from the state's science curriculum has angered the mainstream science community in the United States. "This act ... took us back 100 years in science teaching and education," says Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. "I hope the courts will be the one to find time to correct the decision." The board's decision doesn't require the teaching of creationism, nor does it forbid the teaching of evolution. The specific curriculum is left to the local school boards and to the teachers who now find themselves with questions.

47. KNEA - Kansas National Education Association
We work proactively with the kansas Learning First Alliance, kansas BusinessEducationCoalition, school boards and administrators to promote public schools.
http://www.knea.org/member_benefits.htm
Kansas National
Education Association Search the KNEA Web site
Local UniServ Locations
Benefits of Membership Parent Tips Frequently Asked Questions ... KNEA's Mission
Benefits of Membership
Why Join KNEA? Joining KNEA is good for you personally and professionally... and it's good for kids. You receive member benefits and networking opportunities.
You build relationships with colleagues across the state and nation. You have a proven, credible resource in helping your students succeed.
Regardless of how long you plan to stay in the profession, KNEA is your professional organization because it is comprised of professionals like you. We're the one to go to for ideas and answers. We are like a family, a union of professionals who agree that kids and education are important - and the people who are working in schools are important, too. Who are KNEA members?

48. KNEA - Kansas National Education Association - FAQs
The kansas National education Association's mission is to empower its Involvementwith state agencies and boards. kansas had one of the first UniServ units in
http://www.knea.org/faqs.htm
Kansas National
Education Association Search the KNEA Web site
Local UniServ Locations
Benefits of Membership Parent Tips Frequently Asked Questions ... KNEA's Mission
Kansas National Education Association
Frequently Asked Questions
  • Who may join KNEA?
    What is the mission of KNEA?
    What services does KNEA provide members? How does KNEA assist members in their classrooms? ... How do I send address changes to KNEA? How can I prevent duplicate mailings to my spouse and me?
  • 1. Who may join KNEA?
    KNEA members are teachers from every level of public education, including preschool through higher education; prospective educators in teacher preparation programs; and retired educators. Public school teachers interested in KNEA membership may contact their KNEA Building Representative, their area UniServ Office, or KNEA Headquarters. Back to top 2. What is the mission of KNEA?
    The Kansas National Education Association's mission is to empower its members to promote quality public schools, strengthen the profession of teaching, and improve the well-being of members. KNEA's strategic priorities for its mission are:
    Promote Quality Public Schools
    • Kansas public schools are physically, emotionally and psychologically safe for students and staff.

    49. Other Kansas Links
    Centers; kansas Association of School boards; kansas State Departmentof education; kansas Mathematics and Science education Coalition;
    http://www.kanren.net/resources/kansas_inet_links.html
    Here are some other sites that pertain to research, education and networking found in Kansas. Each one of these sites contains plenty of useful information. The following are links that pertain to research, education, and networking outside of Kansas. Updated: February 19, 2002
    Please send corrections or updates to Webmaster

    50. Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission -Provider Phone Numbers
    California Continuing education for the Bar (CEB), 510642-5342. Defense ResearchInstitute, 312-795-1101. kansas Association of School boards, 785-273-3600.
    http://www.kscle.org/providers.html
    home contact info state of kansas what's new ... online transcript Provider Phone Numbers home American College of Real Estate Lawyers American Corporate Counsel Association American Council of Life Insurance ... American Health Lawyers Association American Intellectual Property Law Association American Judges Association American Law Division-Congressional Research Service American Law Institute (ALI-ABA) American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics American Trial Lawyers' Association (ATLA) Association of American Law Schools (AALS) California Continuing Education for the Bar (CEB) Defense Research Institute Eastern Mineral Law Foundation Energy Bar Association Federal Judicial Center Federal Publications Seminars Government Institutes, Inc. Greater Kansas City Society of Hospital Attorneys International Association of Defense Counsel International Municipal Lawyers Association Johnson County Bar Association Kansas Assn. of Defense Counsel (KADC) Kansas Association of School Boards Kansas Bankers' Association Kansas Bankers' Association Trust Division ... Kansas County and District Attorneys Association (KCDA) Kansas Legal Services, Inc. Kansas Society of Certified Public Accountants Kansas Trial Lawyers' Association Law Education Institutes, Inc.

    51. Kansas Continuing Legal Education-Policy Statement For Law Office Management
    a computer system; electronic bulletin boards; file transfer Court and CLE Rules governingcontinuing legal education. is included in the kansas CLE Handbook.
    http://www.kscle.org/clelawoffice.html
    home contact info state of kansas what's new ... rules governing CLE Policy Statement for Law Office Management home The Commission's policy is to accredit all law office management programming that bears a direct relationship to either the substantive practice of law or ethical/professional responsibilities arising out of the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility or other duties to clients (including malpractice avoidance). The following are illustrative, non-exclusive examples of programming that is accreditable under the standard set forth above: ethical duties and proper office or attorney procedures and/or systems concerning fee contracts, withdrawal from representation, handling of client files, advertising and solicitation, calendars, dockets and tickler systems, confidentiality, trust accounts, conflict screening and avoidance, communication with clients, malpractice risk management, and grievance procedures; employment law relating to lawyers and law offices; law office disaster planning; and legal research skill or system training. Examples of programming that is not accreditable under this standard include courses that are limited to client cultivation; marketing; the economics or profitability of law practice; non-legal skills development, such as efficiency training, speed reading, stress reduction or motivational type presentations; and business management training, computer or information systems or other similar general programming that does not bear a direct relationship to either the substantive practice of law or duties of lawyers to clients as described above.

    52. State Board Of Education
    PRESIDENT Thomas R. Davis, kansas City, was first appointed to the president (1997)of the National Association of State boards of education (NASBE) and a
    http://www.dese.state.mo.us/stateboard/stateboard.html
    Home State Board of Education
    Facts about the Missouri State Board of Education
    Major Duties Members According to the Missouri Constitution, "The supervision of instruction in the public schools shall be vested in a state board of education ..." (Article IX, Section 2a). This provision gives the State Board of Education general authority for public education, within limits set by the General Assembly. ( See Section 161.022 through 161.102, RSMo, for the Board's statutory authority.) The Board is made up of eight citizens appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. Members serve staggered, eight-year terms so that one term expires each year. No more than four members of the Board may belong to the same political party. No more than one member of the Board may reside in the same county or Congressional district. When terms expire, members continue to serve until being replaced or reappointed. The Board elects its own officers each year. The Board usually meets for two days each month in Jefferson City. Members receive $25 for each day of an official meeting. The Board's duties and responsibilities range from preschool to the postsecondary and adult levels. The Board does not have direct authority over higher education institutions. However, the Board sets standards for and approves professional programs for teachers and school administrators in Missouri's public and private higher education institutions.

    53. Archived -- Witnesses: Meetings And Hearings
    Extension Specialist, 4H and Youth Program, kansas State University Paul Brunelle,Executive Director, Maine Association of boards of education, Augusta, ME.
    http://www.ed.gov/pubs/PrisonersOfTime/Witnesses.html
    A r c h i v e d I n f o r m a t i o n
    Prisoners Of Time - April 1994 APPENDIX D
    Witnesses: Meetings and Hearings
    June 26, 1992
    Washington, DC Gordon Ambach, Executive Director, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC Ralph Archibald, Superintendent of Schools, Marion County, FL (President, National Association for Year-Round Education) Lillian Brinkley, President, National Association of Elementary School Principals, Alexandria, VA James Dyke, Secretary of Education, Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond, VA Jeanne Griffith, Associate Commissioner, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC R. David Hall, President and Ward 2 Representative, District of Columbia School Board, Washington, DC Nancy Mead, Director, International Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ Harold Stevenson, Professor of Developmental Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Bruce Walborn, International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions, Alexandria, VA
    September 24, 1992

    54. Office Of Elementary And Secondary Education; Title I Of The Elementary And Seco
    Administrators and Local School boards Charlotte Harris Bilingual education, Texaseducation Agency Alexa Pochowski, Associate Commissioner, kansas Department of
    http://www.ed.gov/legislation/FedRegister/proprule/2002-1/022802a.html
    [Federal Register: February 28, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 40)] [Proposed Rules] [Page 9223-9224] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr28fe02-22] ======================================================================= - DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 34 CFR Chapter II Office of Elementary and Secondary Education; Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as Amended (ESEA); Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged AGENCY: Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of meetings to conduct a negotiated rulemaking process. - SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) of the U.S. Department of Education (Department) will convene a negotiating groupincluding Federal, State, and local education administrators, parents, teachers, and members of local boards of educationto participate in a negotiated rulemaking process prior to publishing proposed regulations to implement part A of Title I, Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies, of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as recently amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Title I is designed to help disadvantaged children meet high academic standards. The negotiating committee will review draft proposed regulations developed on statutory provisions involving standards and assessments. DATES: We will hold five meetings of the negotiating group. The dates and times of the meetings are in the Schedule of Negotiations. ADDRESSES: The five meetings to conduct the negotiated rulemaking process will be held at the U.S. Department of Education, Barnard Auditorium, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Wilhelm, Compensatory Education Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 3W202, Washington, DC 20202-6132. Telephone (202) 260-0826. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding paragraph. The meeting site is accessible to individuals with disabilities. If you need an auxiliary aid or service to participate in the meeting (e.g., interpreting service, assistive listening device, or materials in alternative format), notify the contact person listed in this notice in advance of the scheduled meeting date. We will make every effort to meet any request we receive. The meetings are open to the public for individuals who wish to observe the process. The Department anticipates publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking no later than May 1, 2002. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Schedule of Negotiations We will hold five meetings of the negotiating group to review the draft proposed regulations: 1. March 11, 2002, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 2. March 12, 2002, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 3. March 13, 2002, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 4. March 19, 2002, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 5. March 20, 2002, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Background On January 8, 2002, the President signed Pub. L. 107-110, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, amending the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). Among other things, the NCLB Act reauthorizesfor a six-year periodprograms under Title I of the ESEA designed to help disadvantaged children reach high academic standards. Section 1901 of Title I requires that, before publishing any proposed regulations to implement programs under Title I, the Department obtain the advice and recommendations of representatives of State and local administrators, parents, teachers and paraprofessionals, members of local school boards, and other organizations involved with the implementation and operation of Title I programs. On January 18, 2002, the U.S. Secretary of Education published a notice in the Federal Register (67 FR 2770) requesting advice and recommendations on regulatory issues under Title I. In response to that notice, the Assistant Secretary received comments from more than 100 individuals and organizations. Section 1901 also requires the Department, after obtaining advice and recommendations and before publishing proposed regulations, to establish a negotiated rulemaking process on, at a minimum, issues relating to standards and assessments under Title I, Part A. The statute requires that the negotiators represent all geographic regions of the United States and an equitable balance between representatives of parents and students and representatives of educators and education officials. To convene a diverse negotiating group that represents a wide range of interests, the Assistant Secretary asked more than 70 organizations to submit nominations with their comments on regulatory issues. In addition, the Department received nominations from individuals and organizations that participated in focus groups held to solicit advice or who commented independently in response to the Federal Register notice. The Assistant Secretary has selected individuals to participate in the negotiated rulemaking process from among the individuals and organizations providing advice and recommendations in response to the Federal Register notice, including representation form all geographic regions of the United States and an equitable balance between representatives of parents and students and representatives of educators and education officials. The Assistant Secretary has also considered negotiators who would contribute to the diversity and expertise of the group. The following are the individuals who will participate in negotiated rulemaking and the interests they represent: [[Page 9224]] Representing State Administrators and State Boards of Education Judy Catchpole, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Wyoming Department of Education Jim Horne, Secretary of Education, Florida Department of Education Dr. Bob Harmon, Assistant State Superintendent for Special Programs, Washington Department of Public Instruction Rodney Watson, Assistant Superintendent, Office of Student and School Standards, Louisiana Department of Education Lou Fabrizio, Director, Division of Accountability Services, North Carolina Department of Education Rae Belisle, Chief Counsel, California State Board of Education Representing Local Administrators and Local School Boards Charlotte Harris, Senior Director of Program Development, Boston (MA) Public Schools, J. Alvin Wilbanks, Superintendent, Gwinnett County (GA), Public Schools, Beverly Carroll, Alachua County (FL) School Board, Nelson Smith, charter schools, Washington, DC. Representing Principals and Teachers Avis Cotton, Principal, Dardanelle (AR) Middle School, Enedelia Scholfield, Principal, W.L. Henry Elementary School, Hillsboro (OR), Patricia Fisher, Title I teacher, Hooker Public Schools (OK). Representing Students (Including At-risk Students, Migrant Students, Limited-English-Proficient Students, Students With Disabilities, and Private School Students): Tasha Tillman, parent, Colorado Springs (CO). Minnie Pearce, parent, Detroit (MI). Arturo Abarca, teacher, Helitrope Elementary School, Los Angeles Unified School District (CA). Maria Seidner, Director, Bilingual Education, Texas Education Agency. Dr. Alexa Pochowski, Associate Commissioner, Kansas Department of Education. Myrna Toney, Director of Migrant Education, Wisconsin Department of Education. John R. Clark, Assistant Superintendent, Department of Education, Diocese of Allentown (PA). Representing Business Interests John Stevens, Director, Texas Business and Education Coalition. Representing the U.S. Department of Education Susan B. Neuman, Ed.D., Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education. Dr. Joseph F. Johnson, Director, Compensatory Education Programs. If an individual feels that his or her interests are not adequately represented by this diverse group, the individual may petition, at the initial meeting on March 11, to be seated as a negotiator. The negotiating group will determine whether that individual should be added to the group. The negotiating group will make that decision based on factors such as whether the individual (1) Would be substantially affected by the rule; (2) Has interests not already adequately represented by the group; and (3) Meets the requirements of section 1901 of the ESEA. Topics Selected for Negotiation The issues selected for negotiated rulemaking are the Title I, Part A requirements pertaining to standards and assessments. As the January 18 notice indicated, the Department also considered including in the negotiations issues pertaining to adequate yearly progress. Based on significant concerns raised during the public comment period, and given the statutory time constraints discussed in the section on ``Regional Meetings'' below, however, the Department is not subjecting it to negotiated rulemaking. That issue, as well as other Title I issues, will be addressed through the regular rulemaking process (including the regional meetings discussed below). The draft of the proposed regulations that the negotiators will review is available on the Department's Web site at www.ed.gov/nelb/. Facilitator The Department has retained the services of an assessment expert and a facilitator for the negotitated rulemaking process. The assessment expert will be available as a resource to the negotiators on assessments issues. The facilitator will serve as a neutral convenor for the negotiations. Neither the assessment expert nor the facilitator will be involved with the substantive development of the regulations. The facilitator's role is to (1) Chair negotiating sessions; (2) Help the negotiating process run smoothly and (3) Help participants define issues and reach consensus. The facilitator will keep a record of the negotiated rulemaking meetings, which will be placed in the Department's rulemaking docket for this regulatory action. Regional Meetings The Department has developed this process and scheduled negotiated rulemaking very expeditiously, since the NCLB Act was enacted on January 8, and the Department hopes to issue these regulations on a timely basis so that they will be in place as early as possible this year, and issued in accordance with the requirements of section 1908 of the Act. That section requires that regulations to implement sections 1111 and 1116 of this Act be issued within six months of enactment. Recognizing that many interested parties may not yet have an opportunity to provide input or may not be able to attend the negotiated rulemaking meetings, the Department intends to convene four regional meetings during the public comment period after publishing proposed regulations in accordance with section 1901 of the Act. At these meetings, interested parties can provide input regarding the proposed regulations. The Department will announce these meetings in a notice in the Federal Register in the near future. Electronic Access to This Document You may view this document, in Text or Abobe Portable Document Format (PDF), on the Internet at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ legislation/FedRegister To use the PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office toll free at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC area at (202) 512-1530. Note: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO access at: http:// www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 84.010, Improving Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies)

    55. Center For Educational Testing And Evaluation
    by State Links to the State boards of education Web Links to US Department of education,educational organizations Photos © The University of kansas Office of
    http://www.cete.ku.edu/links.shtml
    Links

    56. State And Local Government On The Net: Kansas
    boards and Commissions TOC. of Technical Professions; Office of the kansas SecuritiesCommissioner; Gaming Commission; State Board of education; State Conservation
    http://www.statelocalgov.net/ks.htm
    Select State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Washington DC Tribal Govt. Am. Samoa Guam N. Mariana Is. Puerto Rico U.S. Virgin Is.
    Index

    Search

    Add/Update Link

    Read FAQ
    ...
    Tell a Friend
    Kansas
    Statewide Offices Legislative Branch Judicial Branch Executive Branch ... Libraries
    State Home Page
    Statewide Offices
    Legislative Branch
    Judicial Branch
    Executive Branch
    Boards and Commissions
    County
    City
    Other
    Libraries

    TOC Index Search The FAQ Add a Link ... Piper Resources
    Last updated: 04/07/03

    57. Psychology Licensing Board Contact Information & Resources
    license or registration, and continuing education requirements United States PsychologyLaws Licensing boards kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board 712 S
    http://kspope.com/licensing/index.php
    Topics on this site: About this site: home
    Addresses and phone numbers for each of the provincial psychology licensing boards in Canada and the state licensing boards in the United States are listed below. If the board has a web site, a link is provided to its home page. Where possible, links are provided for various documents such as legislation relevant to the practice of psychology in that province or state, application information for a psychology license or registration, and continuing education requirements. I try to keep these links updated and the information current, but if you find a link that doesn't work or you're aware of more current information, I'd appreciate your sending corrections or updates to comments@kspope.com . Thanks! These links are provided only to help people get started in their search for relevant information. Information placed on the web may not always be complete, up-to-date, accurate, or applicable to all situations. Legislation, case law, regulations, and other requirements are often complex and can change rapidly. Always consult directly with the licensing board to confirm that you have information that is current and complete in regard to your specific situation, question, or concern. Please follow this link to a more

    58. Distance Education Delivery Methods
    Overview of Delivery Methods kansas State University has been offering distance educationcourses for Listservs/Message boards Listservs or threaded message
    http://www.dce.ksu.edu/distance/deliverymethods/
    Distance Education
    Delivery Methods Delivery Overview Course Search Degree Programs Non-Credit Programs ... TELENET#2
    Overview of Delivery Methods
    Kansas State University offers a variety of distance education courses using the most appropriate distance education delivery method(s) for each course.
    K-State has been offering distance education courses for more than 30 years, utilizing cutting-edge technologies that not only enhance the learning environment, but extend it far beyond the university's physical boundaries.
    Types of Delivery Systems
    Web
    Many courses are delivered using K-State Online , a course management system designed to deliver an interactive, Web-based classroom to students. K-State Online enables students with time and geographic constraints to take advantage of the flexibility of learning over the Internet.
    How does K-State Online accomplish this?

    59. Parent Involvement - National Standards
    together a packet to help local boards of ed this legislation, the Indiana Departmentof education has been kansas State Board of education members voted to
    http://www.pta.org/parentinvolvement/standards/state.asp
    April 08, 2003 Partners for Student Success
    Building Successful Partnerships

    National Standards

    Reflections Program
    ...
    Home

    National Standards Statewide Alaska Connecticut Delaware
    Indiana
    ... Tennessee Alaska:
    On June 13, 2001 The Alaska Department of Education and Early Development endorsed the National
    Standards.
    To the Top
    Connecticut:
    Connecticut's State Board of Education adopted a state policy on School, Family, Community Partnerships on August 7, 1997 based on the National PTA's National Standards for Parent/Family Involvement Programs. Connecticut's General Assembly passed a law in 1997 (Public Act 97-290) which was intended to foster meaningful partnerships among schools, families, and communities to enhance student learning. It stated that ALL local and regional boards of education were required to develop, adopt, and implement written policies and procedures to encourage parent-teacher communication by September 1, 1998. The Connecticut Department of Education along with community partners including the Connecticut PTA, put together a packet to help local boards of ed comply with the law. The packet contained a sample policy, the six standards in detail, an overview of the law, and procedures and agreements that had been developed in school districts around the country, as models for communities to use. This policy and law impact 1,068 public schools including 645 elementary, 163 junior HS/middle schools, 163 high schools, and 17 vocational/technical schools, serving 545,619 public school students.

    60. ECS Results
    Iowa, Area education agency chief administrators are appointed byarea education agency boards of directors. kansas, Not applicable.
    http://www.ecs.org/dbsearches/Search_Info/GovernanceStructuresReports.asp?tbl=ta

    A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  

    Page 3     41-60 of 100    Back | 1  | 2  | 3  | 4  | 5  | Next 20

    free hit counter